Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Leadership
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kodish, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Paradoxes of Leadership: The Contribution of Aristotle

Slavica Kodish

Arkansas Tech University, USA

Collins's (2001a) findings that great leaders possess a paradoxical combination of traits have, for the most part, left the leadership community unresponsive despite their potential implications for conceptualizing leadership. Playful metaphors and alluring ideas that underpin present-day leadership theory provide many insights into leadership, but seem to be unable to explain the complex and contextual nature of leadership. At a time when a host of examples attest to the limitations of understanding leadership in creative yet simplistic ways, findings that incorporate the notion of complexity require closer scrutiny. In this article, the author uses Collins's research as a starting point for addressing the salience of a holistic understanding of leadership. Specifically, the author provides an explanation of the paradoxical combination of leadership traits by invoking Aristotle's philosophy, and, in particular, the complexity inherent in his teleological, ethical, and action-oriented view of the world. Ramifications of a narcissistic approach to leadership are addressed as an illustration of the perils of an overly simplistic and decontextualized understanding of leadership.

Key Words: actionable theory • complexity • metaphor • narcissism • paradox

Leadership, Vol. 2, No. 4, 451-468 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1742715006069175
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 LeadershipHome page
A. Pullen and C. Rhodes
`It's All About Me!': Gendered Narcissism and Leaders' Identity Work
Leadership, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 5 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
B. Carroll and L. Levy
Defaulting to Management: Leadership Defined By What It Is Not
Organization, January 1, 2008; 15(1): 75 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 LeadershipHome page
K. Grint
Learning to Lead: Can Aristotle Help Us Find the Road to Wisdom?
Leadership, May 1, 2007; 3(2): 231 - 246.
[PDF]