Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Leadership
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Breukelen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Le Blanc, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Leader-Member Exchange Theory and Research: Accomplishments and Future Challenges

Wim van Breukelen

Leiden University, The Netherlands, University of Portsmouth, UK and Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Birgit Schyns

Leiden University, The Netherlands, University of Portsmouth, UK and Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Pascale Le Blanc

Leiden University, The Netherlands, University of Portsmouth, UK and Utrecht University, The Netherlands

In the Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership, the quality of the exchange relationship between a leader and a particular member of a work unit, team or organization is the basic unit of analysis (dyad). In this article, we try to answer the question whether research on the various aspects of the exchange processes between leaders and their subordinates is consistent with the theoretical underpinnings of LMX theory. Our focus is on the similarities and differences between the theoretical assumptions of LMX theory and the way the core concepts are elaborated in empirical studies. Although LMX theory has resulted in a number of useful accomplishments, both theoretical and practical, it still faces a number of challenges. The main challenges are to carry out a thorough and consistent refinement of the measuring instruments used, and to gain more insight into the mutual behaviours, attributions, and evaluations which facilitate or inhibit the development of high-quality working relationships.

Key Words: leader-member exchange • leadership • measuring instruments • social exchange

Leadership, Vol. 2, No. 3, 295-316 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1742715006066023


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LeadershipHome page
L. Makela
Representations of Change within Dyadic Relationships between Leader and Follower: Discourses of Pregnant Followers
Leadership, May 1, 2009; 5(2): 171 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
D. Brannon, T. Barry, P. Kemper, A. Schreiner, and J. Vasey
Job Perceptions and Intent to Leave Among Direct Care Workers: Evidence From the Better Jobs Better Care Demonstrations
Gerontologist, December 1, 2007; 47(6): 820 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]