Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Leadership
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolden, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gosling, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Leadership Competencies: Time to Change the Tune?

Richard Bolden

Jonathan Gosling

University of Exeter, UK

This article indicates how the competency approach to leadership could be conceived of as a repeating refrain that continues to offer an illusory promise to rationalize and simplify the processes of selecting, measuring and developing leaders, yet only reflects a fragment of the complexity that is leadership. To make this argument we draw on two sets of data: a review of leadership competency frameworks and an analysis of participant reports from a reflective leadership development programme. A lexical analysis comparing the two data sets highlights a substantial difference with regards to the relative importance placed on the moral, emotional and relationship dimensions of leadership. The implications of these differences are considered, as are ways in which the competency approach could be aligned more closely with the current and future needs of leaders and organizations. In particular, we argue that a more discursive approach that helps to reveal and challenge underlying organizational assumptions is likely to be more beneficial if organizations are looking to move beyond individualistic notions of leadership towards more inclusive and collective forms. Methodological issues are also raised around the comparative analysis (both semantic and linguistic) of apparently incommensurable texts.

Key Words: competencies • emotion • ethics • leadership • lexical analysis • management • standards

Leadership, Vol. 2, No. 2, 147-163 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1742715006062932


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LeadershipHome page
A. Bryman and S. Lilley
Leadership Researchers on Leadership in Higher Education
Leadership, August 1, 2009; 5(3): 331 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
B. Carroll, L. Levy, and D. Richmond
Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm
Leadership, November 1, 2008; 4(4): 363 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
Ling Chen
Leaders or Leadership: Alternative Approaches to Leadership Studies
Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 21(4): 547 - 555.
[PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
K. Grint
Learning to Lead: Can Aristotle Help Us Find the Road to Wisdom?
Leadership, May 1, 2007; 3(2): 231 - 246.
[PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
E. Smythe and A. Norton
Thinking as Leadership/Leadership as Thinking
Leadership, February 1, 2007; 3(1): 65 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]