Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Leadership
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bligh, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Pillai, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Crisis and Charisma in the California Recall Election

Michelle C. Bligh

Claremont Graduate University, USA, michelle.bligh{at}cgu.edu

Jeffrey C. Kohles

California State University San Marcos, USA, jkohles{at}csusm.edu

Rajnandini Pillai

California State University San Marcos, USA, rpillai{at}csusm.edu

The 2003 California recall election represented a unique opportunity to study leadership in the context of what has been described in the popular media as an economic and political crisis. Participants (N= 311) reported their perceptions of the current situation in California and their tendency to attribute outcomes to leaders rather than situational factors (the Romance of Leadership Scale, or RLS). They subsequently watched video clips of the incumbent, the incumbent party challenger and the outside challenger, and rated their delivery style, charisma and expected effectiveness in office. Results indicate that both challengers were rated as more charismatic than the incumbent, and crisis perceptions were related to expected effectiveness ratings for all three candidates. In addition, higher charismatic delivery was associated with higher ratings of charisma and effectiveness. Finally, the RLS was significantly related to ratings of the outside challenger’s charisma, and interacted with crisis perceptions to predict charisma ratings of both the incumbent party challenger and the outside challenger. Implications for the relationship between crisis and charisma, the importance of charismatic delivery style, and situational influences on the RLS are discussed.

Key Words: charisma • crisis • election • leadership

Leadership, Vol. 1, No. 3, 323-352 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1742715005054440


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LeadershipHome page
M. Barisione
Valence Image and the Standardisation of Democratic Political Leadership
Leadership, February 1, 2009; 5(1): 41 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
M. C. Bligh and B. Schyns
Leading Question: The Romance Lives On: Contemporary Issues Surrounding the Romance of Leadership
Leadership, August 1, 2007; 3(3): 343 - 360.
[PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
B. Schyns, J. R. Meindl, and M. A. Croon
The Romance of Leadership Scale: Cross-cultural Testing and Refinement
Leadership, February 1, 2007; 3(1): 29 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]